翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ The Sucker Punch Show
・ The Suckling
・ The Sucklord
・ The Sudan Girl Guides Association
・ The Sudans
・ The Sudden Loneliness of Konrad Steiner
・ The Sudden Storm
・ The Sue Sylvester Shuffle
・ The Sufferer & the Witness
・ The Sufferer & the Witness Tour
・ The Sufferettes
・ The Suffering
・ The Suffering (Doctor Who audio)
・ The Suffering (song)
・ The Suffering (video game)
The Suffering of God
・ The Suffers
・ The Suffolk Journal
・ The Suffolk Miracle
・ The Suffolk System
・ The Suffrage of Elvira
・ The Suffragist
・ The Suffrajets
・ The Sufis
・ The Sugar Babies
・ The Sugar Factory
・ The Sugar Factory (album)
・ The Sugar Girls
・ The Sugar Hill Suite
・ The Sugar Man


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

The Suffering of God : ウィキペディア英語版
The Suffering of God
''The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective'' is a book by noted Old Testament scholar, Terence E. Fretheim. In 1984 it appeared as number 14 in the Overtures to Biblical Theology series published by Fortress Press.
== Summary and Review ==

Most Christians believe the incarnation of God is an exclusively New Testament idea, but in The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective, Terence E. Fretheim daringly argues that incarnation has always been God’s standard method of interaction with humanity. Through insightful exegesis and a solid literary and philosophical approach to Scripture, Fretheim draws the elusive God of the Old Testament closer than many Christians will be comfortable with. Indeed, the author seeks to balance the common images of God as wrathful judge or cold lawgiver with an image of God in relationship with humanity. According to Fretheim, God suffers because He has completely and intimately bound Himself in relation to the created world, especially His people Israel.
Fretheim defends his thesis by claiming that “metaphors matter” and appealing to biblical images of an imminent deity. For him, the most significant metaphors for God in the Old Testament are anthropomorphic. If man is created in the image of God, he argues, then we have “permtgtygrtydw34tcv3tission to reverse the process and, by looking at the human, learn what God is like” (p. 11). The human metaphor is presented as the dominant expression of God’s nature and character. Naturally, the author acknowledges that many aspects of humanity are not appropriate for describing God. Sexuality, death, sinfulness, etc. are aspects of human nature that should not be ascribed to God. These ungodly aspects of humanity have moved some Christians to dismiss anthropomorphic descriptions of God out of hand, but Fretheim argues that the human metaphor is so pervasive and appropriate that it acts as a sort of guide, directing the reader as to the proper way to understand all non-human metaphors.
The human metaphor has been long neglected in Fretheim’s opinion, but he sees feminist theology, liberation / Black theology, and the theological response to catastrophic events of the twentieth century as positive responses to this neglect. The problem, he says, is that too many theologians are doing their own exegesis, and they are bringing ideas to the text which cannot be supported. He argues that biblical scholars, biased by their theology, have largely ignored texts concerning God’s repentance, downplayed anthropomorphic descriptions of God, and misunderstood issues relating to divine foreknowledge. Fretheim believes that an unbiased view will be more pluralistic and more willing to incorporate the relational aspects of the Old Testament God.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「The Suffering of God」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.